Controverted PointSaññāvedayitanirodhasamāpatti lokuttarāti? The argument is similar to that inKv 15.5Āmantā. The argument is similar to that inKv 15.5Maggo phalaṁ nibbānaṁ, sotāpattimaggo sotāpattiphalaṁ …pe… bojjhaṅgoti? Shwe Zan AungNa hevaṁ vattabbe …pe….

This SuttaCentral edition was prepared byManfred WierichandVen. Vimalaand proofread byJosephine Tobin. Some changes were introduced:Na vattabbaṁ—Manfred Wierich“saññāvedayitanirodhasamāpatti lokuttarā”ti? Ven. VimalaĀmantā. Josephine TobinLokiyāti? Abbreviations, i.e., those of cited works and the participants in the controversies, were expanded.Cross-references were linked.Some typographic changes were introduced, among others, i.e.: the phonetic symbol “ŋ” was changed to the Pāli diacritical letter “ṃ”, “ô” to “o”, single quotes to double quotes, and “:—” to “:”.Letter-spacing with fixed spaces was replaced with bold font.The corrigenda were merged into the text. Some could not be resolved, though.Na hevaṁ vattabbe. Abbreviations, i.e., those of cited works and the participants in the controversies, were expanded.Tena hi lokuttarāti.

Cross-references were linked.Saññāvedayitakathā niṭṭhitā.