1. The section with a succession on legal issues 1. Adhikaraṇapariyāyavāra

In regard to legal issues arising from disputes: Vivādādhikaraṇassa—What is the forerunner? kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? How many reasons are there? Kati ṭhānāni? How many grounds? Kati vatthūni? How many foundations? Kati bhūmiyo? How many causes? Kati hetū? How many roots? Kati mūlāni? Through how many motives does one dispute? Katihākārehi vivadati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute settled? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from accusations: Anuvādādhikaraṇassa—What is the forerunner? kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? How many reasons are there? Kati ṭhānāni? How many grounds? Kati vatthūni? How many foundations? Kati bhūmiyo? How many causes? Kati hetū? How many roots? Kati mūlāni? Through how many motives does one accuse? Katihākārehi anuvadati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from offenses: Āpattādhikaraṇassa—What is the forerunner? kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? How many reasons are there? Kati ṭhānāni? How many grounds? Kati vatthūni? How many foundations? Kati bhūmiyo? How many causes? Kati hetū? How many roots? Kati mūlāni? Through how many motives does one commit an offense? Katihākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from business: Kiccādhikaraṇassa—What is the forerunner? kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? How many reasons are there? Kati ṭhānāni? How many grounds? Kati vatthūni? How many foundations? Kati bhūmiyo? How many causes? Kati hetū? How many roots? Kati mūlāni? Through how many motives does one give rise to business? Katihākārehi kiccaṁ jāyati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from business settled? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from disputes?” Vivādādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. “How many reasons are there?” Kati ṭhānānīti? The eighteen grounds for schism. Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni ṭhānāni. “How many grounds are there?” Kati vatthūnīti? The eighteen grounds for schism. Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni. “How many foundations are there?” Kati bhūmiyoti? The eighteen grounds for schism. Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni bhūmiyo. “How many causes are there?” Kati hetūti? Nine: Nava hetū—there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. “How many roots are there?” Kati mūlānīti? Twelve. Dvādasa mūlāni. “Through how many motives does one dispute?” Katihākārehi vivadatīti? Through two: Dvīhākārehi vivadati—through a view that accords with the Teaching or through a view that is contrary to the Teaching. dhammadiṭṭhi vā adhammadiṭṭhi vā. “Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute settled?” Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Through two of them: Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from accusations?” Anuvādādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. “How many reasons are there?” Kati ṭhānānīti? The four failures. Catasso vipattiyo ṭhānāni. “How many grounds are there?” Kati vatthūnīti? The four failures. Catasso vipattiyo vatthūni. “How many foundations are there?” Kati bhūmiyoti? The four failures. Catasso vipattiyo bhūmiyo. “How many causes are there?” Kati hetūti? Nine: Nava hetū—there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. “How many roots are there?” Kati mūlānīti? Fourteen. Cuddasa mūlāni. “Through how many motives does one accuse?” Katihākārehi anuvadatīti? Through two: Dvīhākārehi anuvadati—through action or through offense. vatthuto vā āpattito vā. “Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation settled?” Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Through four of them: Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from offenses?” Āpattādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. “How many reasons are there?” Kati ṭhānānīti? The seven classes of offenses. Satta āpattikkhandhā ṭhānāni. “How many grounds are there?” Kati vatthūnīti? The seven classes of offenses. Satta āpattikkhandhā vatthūni. “How many foundations are there?” Kati bhūmiyoti? The seven classes of offenses. Satta āpattikkhandhā bhūmiyo. “How many causes are there?” Kati hetūti? Six: Cha hetū—three unwholesome causes and three indeterminate causes. tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. “How many roots are there?” Kati mūlānīti? The six originations of offenses. Cha āpattisamuṭṭhānāni mūlāni. “Through how many motives does one commit an offense?” Katihākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjatīti? Through six: Chahākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjati—through shamelessness, through ignorance, through being overcome by anxiety, through perceiving what is unallowable as allowable, through perceiving what is allowable as unallowable, through absentmindedness. alajjitā, aññāṇatā, kukkuccapakatatā, akappiye kappiyasaññitā, kappiye akappiyasaññitā, satisammosā. “Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an offense settled?” Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Through three of them: Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face and through acting according to what has been admitted, and through resolution face-to-face and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca, sammukhāvinayena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from business?” Kiccādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. “How many reasons are there?” Kati ṭhānānīti? The four legal procedures. Cattāri kammāni ṭhānāni. “How many grounds are there?” Kati vatthūnīti? The four legal procedures. Cattāri kammāni vatthūni. “How many foundations are there?” Kati bhūmiyoti? The four legal procedures. Cattāri kammāni bhūmiyo. “How many causes are there?” Kati hetūti? Nine: Nava hetū—there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. “How many roots are there?” Kati mūlānīti? One: Ekaṁ mūlaṁ—The Sangha. saṅgho. “Through how many motives does one give rise to business?” Katihākārehi kiccaṁ jāyatīti? Through two: Dvīhākārehi kiccaṁ jāyati—through a motion or through getting permission. ñattito vā apalokanato vā. “Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from business settled?” Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Through one: Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati—through resolution face-to-face. sammukhāvinayena.

How many principles for settling are there? Kati samathā? Seven: Satta samathā. resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a majority decision, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass. Sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, yebhuyyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako—ime satta samathā.

With a different presentation, might the seven principles for settling become ten, and the ten become seven? Siyā ime satta samathā dasa samathā honti, dasa samathā satta samathā honti vatthuvasena pariyāyena? They might. Siyāti.

How? Kathañca siyā? A legal issue arising from a dispute is settled through two principles, a legal issue arising from an accusation is settled through four principles, a legal issue arising from an offense is settled through three principles, a legal issue arising from business is settled through one principle. Vivādādhikaraṇassa dve samathā, anuvādādhikaraṇassa cattāro samathā, āpattādhikaraṇassa tayo samathā, kiccādhikaraṇassa eko samatho. In this way, the seven principles for settling become ten, and the ten become seven. Evaṁ ime satta samathā dasa samathā honti, dasa samathā satta samathā honti vatthuvasena pariyāyena.

The sixth section on “a different presentation” is finished. Pariyāyavāro niṭṭhito chaṭṭho.

2. The section on “in common” 2. Sādhāraṇavāra

How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from disputes do the monks and the nuns have in common? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? How many do they not have in common? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from accusations do the monks and the nuns have in common? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? How many do they not have in common? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from offenses do the monks and the nuns have in common? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? How many do they not have in common? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from business do the monks and the nuns have in common? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? How many do they not have in common? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā?

They have two principles for settling legal issues arising from disputes in common: Dve samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā—resolution face-to-face and a majority decision. sammukhāvinayo, yebhuyyasikā. And they have five not in common: Pañca samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā—resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass. sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

They have four principles for settling legal issues arising from accusations in common: Cattāro samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā—resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and a further penalty. sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā. And they have three not in common: Tayo samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā—a majority decision, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikā, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako.

They have three principles for settling legal issues arising from offenses in common: Tayo samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā—resolution face-to-face, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako. And they have four not in common: Cattāro samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā—a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and a further penalty. yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā.

They have one principle for settling legal issues arising from business in common: Eko samatho kiccādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇo—resolution face-to-face. sammukhāvinayo. And they have six not in common: Cha samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā—a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

The seventh section on “in common” is finished. Sādhāraṇavāro niṭṭhito sattamo.

3. The section on “belonging to that” 3. Tabbhāgiyavāra

How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from disputes? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? How many belong to something else? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from accusations? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? How many belong to something else? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from offenses? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? How many belong to something else? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from business? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? How many belong to something else? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā?

There are two principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from disputes: Dve samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā—resolution face-to-face and a majority decision. sammukhāvinayo, yebhuyyasikā. And there are five that belong to something else: Pañca samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā—resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass. sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

There are four principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from accusations: Cattāro samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā—resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and a further penalty. sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā. And there are three that belong to something else: Tayo samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā—a majority decision, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikā, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako.

There are three principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from offenses: Tayo samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā—resolution face-to-face, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako. And there are four that belong to something else: Cattāro samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā—a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and a further penalty. yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā.

There is one principle for settling that belongs to legal issues arising from business: Eko samatho kiccādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyo—resolution face-to-face. sammukhāvinayo. And there are six that belong to something else: Cha samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā—a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

The eighth section on “belonging to that” is finished Tabbhāgiyavāro niṭṭhito aṭṭhamo.

4. The section on different principles for settling used in common 4. Samathāsamathassasādhāraṇavāra

One principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling, and one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling. Samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā, samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā. It may be that one principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling, and it may be that one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling. Siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā, siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā.

How may it be that one principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā? How may it be that one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā?

A majority decision is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, or covering over as if with grass. Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇā, sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa asādhāraṇā.

Resolution through recollection is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or a majority decision. Sativinayo sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya asādhāraṇo.

Resolution because of past insanity is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, or resolution through recollection. Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa asādhāraṇo.

Acting according to what has been admitted is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa asādhāraṇaṁ.

A further penalty is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted. Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇā, tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa asādhāraṇā.

Covering over as if with grass is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or a further penalty. Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya asādhāraṇo.

Evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā; evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā.

The ninth section on different principles for settling used in common is finished. Samathā samathassa sādhāraṇavāro niṭṭhito navamo.

5. The section on different principles for settling belonging with each other 5. Samathāsamathassatabbhāgiyavāra

One principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling, and one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling. Samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā. It may be that one principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling, and it may be that one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling. Siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā.

How may it be that one principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā? How may it be that one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā?

A majority decision belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, or covering over as if with grass. Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyā, sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa aññabhāgiyā.

Resolution through recollection belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or a majority decision. Sativinayo sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya aññabhāgiyo.

Resolution because of past insanity belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, or resolution through recollection. Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa aññabhāgiyo.

Acting according to what has been admitted belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyaṁ, tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa aññabhāgiyaṁ.

A further penalty belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted. Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyā, tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā.

Covering over as if with grass belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or a further penalty. Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya aññabhāgiyo.

Evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā.

The tenth section on different principles for settling belonging with each other is finished. Samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyavāro niṭṭhito dasamo.

6. The section on “is a principle for settling also resolution face-to-face?” 6. Samathasammukhāvinayavāra

Is a principle for settling also resolution face-to-face, and is resolution face-to-face also a principle for settling? Samatho sammukhāvinayo, sammukhāvinayo samatho? Is a principle for settling also a majority decision, and is a majority decision also a principle for settling? Samatho yebhuyyasikā, yebhuyyasikā samatho? Is a principle for settling also resolution through recollection, and is resolution through recollection also a principle for settling? Samatho sativinayo, sativinayo samatho? Is a principle for settling also resolution because of past insanity, and is resolution because of past insanity also a principle for settling? Samatho amūḷhavinayo, amūḷhavinayo samatho? Is a principle for settling also acting according to what has been admitted, and is acting according to what has been admitted also a principle for settling? Samatho paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ samatho? Is a principle for settling also a further penalty, and is a further penalty also a principle for settling? Samatho tassapāpiyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā samatho? Is a principle for settling also covering over as if with grass, and is covering over as if with grass also a principle for settling? Samatho tiṇavatthārako, tiṇavatthārako samatho?

A majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, and covering over as if with grass: Yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution face-to-face. ime samathā samathā, no sammukhāvinayo. Resolution face-to-face is both a principle for settling and also resolution face-to-face. Sammukhāvinayo samatho ceva sammukhāvinayo ca.

Resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, and resolution face-to-face: Sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not a majority decision. ime samathā samathā, no yebhuyyasikā. A majority decision is both a principle for settling and also a majority decision. Yebhuyyasikā samatho ceva yebhuyyasikā ca.

Resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, and a majority decision: Amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution through recollection. ime samathā samathā, no sativinayo. Resolution through recollection is both a principle for settling and also resolution through recollection. Sativinayo samatho ceva sativinayo ca.

Acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, a majority decision, and resolution through recollection: Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution because of past insanity. ime samathā samathā, no amūḷhavinayo. Resolution because of past insanity is both a principle for settling and also resolution because of past insanity. Amūḷhavinayo samatho ceva amūḷhavinayo ca.

A further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, and resolution because of past insanity: Tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not acting according to what has been admitted. ime samathā samathā, no paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ. Acting according to what has been admitted is both a principle for settling and also acting according to what has been admitted. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ samatho ceva paṭiññātakaraṇañca.

Covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and acting according to what has been admitted: Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not a further penalty. ime samathā samathā, no tassapāpiyasikā. A further penalty is both a principle for settling and also a further penalty. Tassapāpiyasikā samatho ceva tassapāpiyasikā ca.

Resolution face-to-face, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, and a further penalty: Sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā—these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not covering over as if with grass. ime samathā samathā, no tiṇavatthārako. Covering over as if with grass is both a principle for settling and also covering over as if with grass. Tiṇavatthārako samatho ceva tiṇavatthārako ca.

The eleventh section on “is a principle for settling also resolution face-to-face?” is finished. Samathasammukhāvinayavāro niṭṭhito ekādasamo.

7. The section on resolution 7. Vinayavāra

Is a resolution also resolution face-to-face, and is resolution face-to-face also a resolution? Vinayo sammukhāvinayo, sammukhāvinayo vinayo? Is a resolution also a majority decision, and is a majority decision also a resolution? Vinayo yebhuyyasikā, yebhuyyasikā vinayo? Is a resolution also resolution through recollection, and is resolution through recollection also a resolution? Vinayo sativinayo, sativinayo vinayo? Is a resolution also resolution because of past insanity, and is resolution because of past insanity also a resolution? Vinayo amūḷhavinayo, amūḷhavinayo vinayo? Is a resolution also acting according to what has been admitted, and is acting according to what has been admitted also a resolution? Vinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vinayo? Is a resolution also a further penalty, and is a further penalty also a resolution? Vinayo tassapāpiyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā vinayo? Is a resolution also covering over as if with grass, and is covering over as if with grass also a resolution? Vinayo tiṇavatthārako, tiṇavatthārako vinayo?

A resolution may be resolution face-to-face, or it may not be resolution face-to-face. Vinayo siyā sammukhāvinayo siyā na sammukhāvinayo. Resolution face-to-face is both a resolution and also resolution face-to-face. Sammukhāvinayo vinayo ceva sammukhāvinayo ca.

A resolution may be a majority decision, or it may not be a majority decision. Vinayo siyā yebhuyyasikā, siyā na yebhuyyasikā. A majority decision is both a resolution and also a majority decision. Yebhuyyasikā vinayo ceva yebhuyyasikā ca.

A resolution may be resolution through recollection, or it may not be resolution through recollection. Vinayo siyā sativinayo, siyā na sativinayo. Resolution through recollection is both a resolution and also resolution through recollection. Sativinayo vinayo ceva sativinayo ca.

A resolution may be resolution because of past insanity, or it may not be resolution because of past insanity. Vinayo siyā amūḷhavinayo, siyā na amūḷhavinayo. Resolution because of past insanity is both a resolution and also resolution because of past insanity. Amūḷhavinayo vinayo ceva amūḷhavinayo ca.

A resolution may be acting according to what has been admitted, or it may not be acting according to what has been admitted. Vinayo siyā paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, siyā na paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ. Acting according to what has been admitted is both a resolution and also acting according to what has been admitted. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vinayo ceva paṭiññātakaraṇañca.

A resolution may be a further penalty, or it may not be a further penalty. Vinayo siyā tassapāpiyasikā, siyā na tassapāpiyasikā. A further penalty is both a resolution and also a further penalty. Tassapāpiyasikā vinayo ceva tassapāpiyasikā ca.

A resolution may be covering over as if with grass, or it may not be covering over as if with grass. Vinayo siyā tiṇavatthārako, siyā na tiṇavatthārako. Covering over as if with grass is both a resolution and also covering over as if with grass. Tiṇavatthārako vinayo ceva tiṇavatthārako ca.

The twelfth section on resolution is finished. Vinayavāro niṭṭhito dvādasamo.

8. The section on the wholesome 8. Kusalavāra

Is resolution face-to-face wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Sammukhāvinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Is a majority decision wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Yebhuyyasikā kusalā akusalā abyākatā? Is resolution through recollection wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Sativinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Is resolution because of past insanity wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Amūḷhavinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Is acting according to what has been admitted wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ? Is a further penalty wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Tassapāpiyasikā kusalā akusalā abyākatā? Is covering over as if with grass wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Tiṇavatthārako kusalo akusalo abyākato?

Resolution face-to-face may be wholesome or indeterminate; resolution face-to-face is never unwholesome. A majority decision may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Resolution through recollection may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Resolution because of past insanity may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Acting according to what has been admitted may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. A further penalty may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Covering over as if with grass, may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Sammukhāvinayo siyā kusalo, siyā abyākato. Natthi sammukhāvinayo akusalo.

Yebhuyyasikā siyā kusalā, siyā akusalā, siyā abyākatā.

Sativinayo siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato.

Amūḷhavinayo siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ.

Tassapāpiyasikā siyā kusalā, siyā akusalā siyā abyākatā.

Tiṇavatthārako siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato.

Is a legal issue arising from a dispute wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Is a legal issue arising from an accusation wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Is a legal issue arising from an offense wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Is a legal issues arising from business wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ.

A legal issue arising from a dispute may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. A legal issue arising from an accusation may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. A legal issue arising from an offense may be unwholesome or indeterminate; a legal issue arising from an offense is never wholesome. A legal issue arising from business may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ. Natthi āpattādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ.

The thirteenth section on the wholesome is finished. Kusalavāro niṭṭhito terasamo.

9. The section on “where”, the section on questioning 9. Yatthavāra, pucchāvāra

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where a majority decision is appropriate. Yattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; A majority decision is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati. But there, resolution through recollection is not appropriate, nor is resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, or covering over as if with grass. Na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where resolution through recollection is appropriate. Yattha sativinayo labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; Resolution through recollection is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha sativinayo labbhati. But there, resolution because of past insanity is not appropriate, nor is acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or a majority decision. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where resolution because of past insanity is appropriate. Yattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; Resolution because of past insanity is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati. But there, acting according to what has been admitted is not appropriate, nor is a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, or resolution through recollection. Na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate. Yattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; Acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati. But there, a further penalty is not appropriate, nor is covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity. Na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where a further penalty is appropriate. Yattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; A further penalty is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati. But there, covering over as if with grass is not appropriate, nor is a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted. Na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where covering over as if with grass is appropriate. Yattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; Covering over as if with grass is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati. But there, a majority decision is not appropriate, nor is resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or a further penalty. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati.

Where there is a majority decision, there is resolution face-to-face. Yattha yebhuyyasikā tattha sammukhāvinayo; Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is a majority decision. yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha yebhuyyasikā. But there is no resolution through recollection there, nor resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, or covering over as if with grass. Na tattha sativinayo, na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā, na tattha tiṇavatthārako.

Where there is resolution through recollection, there is resolution face-to-face. Yattha sativinayo tattha sammukhāvinayo; Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is resolution through recollection. yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha sativinayo. But there is no resolution because of past insanity there, nor acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or a majority decision. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā, na tattha tiṇavatthārako, na tattha yebhuyyasikā. Resolution face-to-face to be done as the basis … Sammukhāvinayaṁ kātuna mūlaṁ …pe….

Where there is covering over as if with grass, there is resolution face-to-face. Yattha tiṇavatthārako tattha sammukhāvinayo; Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is covering over as if with grass. yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha tiṇavatthārako. But there is no majority decision there, nor resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or a further penalty. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā, na tattha sativinayo, na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā.

The successive permutation series. Cakkapeyyālaṁ.

The fourteenth section on “where” is finished. Yatthavāro niṭṭhito cuddasamo.

10. The section on settling, the section on responding 10. Samathavāra, vissajjanāvāra

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and a majority decision, then, where a majority decision is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there a majority decision is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati. But there resolution through recollection is not appropriate, nor is resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, or covering over as if with grass. Na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and resolution through recollection, then, where resolution through recollection is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there resolution through recollection is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha sativinayo labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha sativinayo labbhati. But there resolution because of past insanity is not appropriate, nor is acting according to what has been admitted, a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or a majority decision. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and resolution because of past insanity, then, where resolution because of past insanity is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there resolution because of past insanity is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati. But there acting according to what has been admitted is not appropriate, nor is a further penalty, covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, or resolution through recollection. Na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and acting according to what has been admitted, then, where acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati. But there a further penalty is not appropriate, nor is covering over as if with grass, a majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity. Na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and a further penalty, then, where a further penalty is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there a further penalty is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati. But there covering over as if with grass is not appropriate, nor is a majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted. Na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and covering over as if with grass, then, where covering over as if with grass is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there covering over as if with grass is appropriate. Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati. But there a majority decision is not appropriate, nor is resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or a further penalty. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati.

The fifteenth section on settling is finished. Samathavāro niṭṭhito pannarasamo.

11. The section on connection 11. Saṁsaṭṭhavāra

“Are ‘legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ connected or disconnected? Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā udāhu visaṁsaṭṭhā? Is it possible to completely separate them and point to their difference?” Labbhā ca panimesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetunti?

“‘Legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ are disconnected, not connected, Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā visaṁsaṭṭhā, no saṁsaṭṭhā. and it’s possible to completely separate them and point to their difference”: Labbhā ca panimesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetunti. they should be told not to say this. So—“mā hevan”tissa vacanīyo. “‘Legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ are connected, not disconnected, Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā, no visaṁsaṭṭhā. and it’s impossible to completely separate them and point to their difference. No ca labbhā imesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetuṁ. Why’s that? Taṁ kissa hetu? Didn’t the Buddha say that Nanu vuttaṁ bhagavatā—there are four kinds of legal issues and seven principles for settling? “cattārimāni, bhikkhave, adhikaraṇāni, satta samathā. Legal issues are settled through the principles for settling; the principles for settling are settled through legal issues. Adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. In this way they are connected, not disconnected, Evaṁ, ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā no visaṁsaṭṭhā; and it’s impossible to completely separate them and point to their difference.” no ca labbhā imesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetun”ti.

The sixteenth section on connection is finished. Saṁsaṭṭhavāro niṭṭhito soḷasamo.

12. The section on settling 12. Sammativāra

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute settled? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from business settled? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

A legal issue arising from a dispute is settled through two principles: Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

A legal issue arising from an accusation is settled through four principles: Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

A legal issue arising from an offense is settled through three principles: Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

A legal issue arising from business is settled through one principle: Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati—through resolution face-to-face. sammukhāvinayena.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from an accusation settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through five: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through four: Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through two: Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca dvīhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through six: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation and a legal issue arising from business settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through four: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an offense and a legal issue arising from business settled? Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through three: Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca tīhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through seven: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through five: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation, a legal issue arising from an offense, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through six: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, a legal issue arising from an offense, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through seven: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

The seventeenth section on settling is finished. Sammativāro niṭṭhito sattarasamo.

13. The section on settling and not settling 13. Sammantinasammantivāra

Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from a dispute settled, and through how many principles is it not settled? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an accusation settled, and through how many principles is it not settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from an offense settled, and through how many principles is it not settled? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Through how many principles for settling is a legal issue arising from business settled, and through how many principles is it not settled? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati?

A legal issue arising from a dispute is settled through two principles: Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca. It is not settled through five principles: Pañcahi samathehi na sammati—through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

A legal issue arising from an accusation is settled through four principles: Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. It is not settled through three principles: Tīhi samathehi na sammati—through a majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

A legal issue arising from an offense is settled through three principles: Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. It is not settled through four principles: Catūhi samathehi na sammati—through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

A legal issue arising from business is settled through one principle: Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati—through resolution face-to-face. sammukhāvinayena. It is not settled through six principles: Chahi samathehi na sammati—through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from an accusation settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through five principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. They are not settled through two principles: Dvīhi samathehi na sammanti—through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through four principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. They are not settled through three principles: Tīhi samathehi na sammanti—through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through two principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca dvīhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca. They are not settled through five principles: Pañcahi samathehi na sammanti—through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from an accusation and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through six principles: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. They are not settled through one principle: Ekena samathena na sammanti—through a majority decision. yebhuyyasikāya.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from an accusation and a legal issue arising from business settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through four principles: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. They are not settled through three principles: Tīhi samathehi na sammanti—through a majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from an offense and a legal issue arising from business settled? Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through three principles: Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca tīhi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. They are not settled through four principles: Catūhi samathehi na sammanti—through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, and a legal issue arising from an offense settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through seven principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. ammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through five principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. They are not settled through two principles: Dvīhi samathehi na sammanti—through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from an accusation, a legal issue arising from an offense, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through six principles: Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. They are not settled through one principle: Ekena samathena na sammanti—through a majority decision. yebhuyyasikāya.

Through how many principles for settling are a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, a legal issue arising from an offense, and a legal issue arising from business settled? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Through how many principles are they not settled? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? They are settled through seven principles: Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti—through resolution face-to-face, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

The eighteenth section on settling and not settling is finished. Sammanti na sammantivāro niṭṭhito aṭṭhārasamo.

14. The section on principles for settling and legal issues 14. Samathādhikaraṇavāra

Are principles for settling settled through principles for settling? Samathā samathehi sammanti? Are principles for settling settled through legal issues? Samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti? Are legal issues settled through principles for settling? Adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti? Are legal issues settled through legal issues? Adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti?

It may be that principles for settling are settled through principles for settling; it may be that principles for settling are not settled through principles for settling. Siyā samathā samathehi sammanti, siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti. It may be that principles for settling are settled through legal issues; it may be that principles for settling are not settled through legal issues. Siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti. It may be that legal issues are settled through principles for settling; it may be that legal issues are not settled through principles for settling. Siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti. It may be that legal issues are settled through legal issues; it may be that legal issues are not settled through legal issues. Siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

How may it be that principles for settling are settled through principles for settling? And how may it be that principles for settling are not settled through principles for settling? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti?

A majority decision is settled through resolution face-to-face. Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass. sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati.

Resolution through recollection is settled through resolution face-to-face. Sativinayo sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, or through a majority decision. amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammāti, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati.

Resolution because of past insanity is settled through resolution face-to-face. Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, through a majority decision, or through resolution through recollection. paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati.

Acting according to what has been admitted is settled through resolution face-to-face. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through a further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, or through resolution because of past insanity. tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati.

A further penalty is settled through resolution face-to-face. Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through covering over as if with grass, through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, or through acting according to what has been admitted. tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati.

Covering over as if with grass is settled through resolution face-to-face. Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, or through a further penalty. yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti.

How may it be that principles for settling are settled through legal issues? How may it be that principles for settling are not settled through legal issues? Kathaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti?

Resolution face-to-face is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Sammukhāvinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A majority decision is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Yebhuyyasikā vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Resolution through recollection is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Sativinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Resolution because of past insanity is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Amūḷhavinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Acting according to what has been admitted is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A further penalty is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Tassapāpiyasikā vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Covering over as if with grass is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. Tiṇavatthārako vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati. Evaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

How may it be that legal issues are settled through principles for settling? How may it be that legal issues are not settled through principles for settling? Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti?

A legal issue arising from a dispute is settled through resolution face-to-face and through a majority decision. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sammati; It is not settled through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass. sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati.

A legal issue arising from an accusation is settled through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca sammati; It is not settled through a majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, or through covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati.

A legal issue arising from an offense is settled through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca sammati; It is not settled through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, or through a further penalty. yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca na sammati.

A legal issue arising from business is settled through resolution face-to-face. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena sammati; It is not settled through a majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through a further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass. yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti.

How may it be that legal issues are settled through legal issues? How may it be that legal issues are not settled through legal issues? Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti? Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti?

A legal issue arising from a dispute is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, through a legal issue arising from an accusation, or through a legal issue arising from an offense. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A legal issue arising from an accusation is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, through a legal issue arising from an accusation, or through a legal issue arising from an offense. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A legal issue arising from an offense is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, through a legal issue arising from an accusation, or through a legal issue arising from an offense. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A legal issue arising from business is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, through a legal issue arising from an accusation, or through a legal issue arising from an offense. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; It is settled through a legal issue arising from business. kiccādhikaraṇena sammati. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

The six principles for settling and the four legal issues are settled through resolution face-to-face. Chāpi samathā cattāropi adhikaraṇā sammukhāvinayena sammanti; Resolution face-to-face is not settled through anything. sammukhāvinayo na kenaci sammati.

The nineteenth section on principles for settling and legal issues is finished. Samathādhikaraṇavāro niṭṭhito ekūnavīsatimo.

15. The section on causing to originate 15. Samuṭṭhāpanavāra

Which of the four legal issues causes a legal issue arising from a dispute to originate? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? None of them. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from a legal issue arising from a dispute. api ca vivādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. How is that? Yathā kathaṁ viya? It may be that monks are disputing, saying, Idha bhikkhū vivadanti—“This is the Teaching”, “This is contrary to the Teaching”, “This is the Monastic Law”, “This is contrary to the Monastic Law”, “This was spoken by the Buddha”, “This was not spoken by the Buddha”, “This was practiced by the Buddha”, “This was not practiced by the Buddha”, “This was laid down by the Buddha”, “This was not laid down by the Buddha”, “This is an offense”, “This is not an offense”, “This is a light offense”, “This is a heavy offense”, “This is a curable offense”, “This is an incurable offense”, “This is a grave offense”, or “This is a minor offense.” “dhammo”ti vā, “adhammo”ti vā, “vinayo”ti vā, “avinayo”ti vā, “abhāsitaṁ alapitaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “bhāsitaṁ lapitaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “anāciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “āciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “apaññattaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “paññattaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “āpattī”ti vā, “anāpattī”ti vā, “lahukā āpattī”ti vā, “garukā āpattī”ti vā, “sāvasesā āpattī”ti vā, “anavasesā āpattī”ti vā, “duṭṭhullā āpattī”ti vā “aduṭṭhullā āpattī”ti vā. In regard to this, whatever there is of quarreling, arguing, conflict, disputing, variety in opinion, difference in opinion, heated speech, or strife—this is called a legal issue arising from a dispute. Yaṁ tattha bhaṇḍanaṁ kalaho viggaho vivādo nānāvādo aññathāvādo vipaccatāya vohāro medhakaṁ, idaṁ vuccati vivādādhikaraṇaṁ. When, during a legal issue arising from a dispute, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. Vivādādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ vivādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes a legal issue arising from an accusation to originate? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? None of them. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from a legal issue arising from an accusation. api ca anuvādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. How is that? Yathā kathaṁ viya? It may be that the monks accuse a monk of failure in morality, failure in conduct, failure in view, or failure in livelihood. Idha bhikkhū bhikkhuṁ anuvadanti sīlavipattiyā vā ācāravipattiyā vā diṭṭhivipattiyā vā ājīvavipattiyā vā. In regard to this, whatever there is of accusations, accusing, allegations, blame, taking sides because of friendship, taking part in the accusation, or supporting the accusation—this is called a legal issue arising from an accusation. Yo tattha anuvādo anuvadanā anullapanā anubhaṇanā anusampavaṅkatā abbhussahanatā anubalappadānaṁ, idaṁ vuccati anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ. When, during a legal issue arising from an accusation, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. Anuvādādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ anuvādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes a legal issue arising from an offense to originate? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? None of them. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from a legal issue arising from an offense. api ca āpattādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. How is that? Yathā kathaṁ viya? There are legal issues arising from offenses because of the five classes of offenses, and there are legal issues arising from offenses because of the seven classes of offenses—these are called legal issues arising from offenses. Pañcapi āpattikkhandhā āpattādhikaraṇaṁ, sattapi āpattikkhandhā āpattādhikaraṇaṁ, idaṁ vuccati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. When, during a legal issue arising from an offense, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. Āpattādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ āpattādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes a legal issue arising from business to originate? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? None of them. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti, Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from a legal issue arising from business. api ca kiccādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. How is that? Yathā kathaṁ viya? Whatever is the duty or the business of the Sangha—a legal procedure consisting of getting permission, a legal procedure consisting of one motion, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and one announcement, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and three announcements—this is called a legal issue arising from business. Yā saṅghassa kiccayatā karaṇīyatā apalokanakammaṁ ñattikammaṁ ñattidutiyakammaṁ ñatticatutthakammaṁ, idaṁ vuccati kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. When, during a legal issue arising from business, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. Kiccādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ kiccādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

The twentieth section on causing to originate is finished. Samuṭṭhāpanavāro niṭṭhito vīsatimo.

16. The section on “belonging to” 16. Bhajativāra

“To which of the four legal issues does a legal issue arising from a dispute belong? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Which legal issue does it depend on? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Which legal issue is it included in? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Which legal issue is it grouped with? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues does a legal issue arising from an accusation belong? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Which legal issue does it depend on? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Which legal issue is it included in? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Which legal issue is it grouped with? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues does a legal issue arising from an offense belong? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Which legal issue does it depend on? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Which legal issue is it included in? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Which legal issue is it grouped with? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues does a legal issue arising from business belong? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Which legal issue does it depend on? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Which legal issue is it included in? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Which legal issue is it grouped with? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

A legal issue arising from a dispute belongs to legal issues arising from disputes; it depends on legal issues arising from disputes; it is included in legal issues arising from disputes; it is grouped with legal issues arising from disputes. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ vivādādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, vivādādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, vivādādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, vivādādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

A legal issue arising from an accusation belongs to legal issues arising from accusations; it depends on legal issues arising from accusations; it is included in legal issues arising from accusations; it is grouped with legal issues arising from accusations. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, anuvādādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

A legal issue arising from an offense belongs to legal issues arising from offenses; it depends on legal issues arising from offenses; it is included in legal issues arising from offenses; it is grouped with legal issues arising from offenses. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ āpattādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, āpattādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, āpattādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, āpattādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

A legal issue arising from business belongs to legal issues arising from business; it depends on legal issues arising from business; it is included in legal issues arising from business; it is grouped with legal issues arising from business. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ kiccādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, kiccādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, kiccādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, kiccādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

To how many of the seven principles for settling does a legal issue arising from a dispute belong? On how many principles for settling does it depend? In how many principles for settling is it included? With how many principles for settling is it grouped? Through how many principles for settling is it settled? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling does a legal issue arising from an accusation belong? On how many principles for settling does it depend? In how many principles for settling is it included? With how many principles for settling is it grouped? Through how many principles for settling is it settled? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling does a legal issue arising from an offense belong? On how many principles for settling does it depend? In how many principles for settling is it included? With how many principles for settling is it grouped? Through how many principles for settling is it settled? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling does a legal issue arising from business belong? On how many principles for settling does it depend? In how many principles for settling is it included? With how many principles for settling is it grouped? Through how many principles for settling is it settled? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

A legal issue arising from a dispute belongs to two principles for settling; it depends on two principles for settling; it is included in two principles for settling; it is grouped with two principles for settling; it is settled through two principles for settling: Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ dve samathe bhajati, dve samathe upanissitaṁ, dve samathe pariyāpannaṁ, dvīhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, dvīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face and through a majority decision. sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

A legal issue arising from an accusation belongs to four principles for settling; it depends on four principles for settling; it is included in four principles for settling; it is grouped with four principles for settling; it is settled through four principles for settling: Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ cattāro samathe bhajati, cattāro samathe upanissitaṁ, cattāro samathe pariyāpannaṁ, catūhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, catūhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through a further penalty. sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

A legal issue arising from an offense belongs to three principles for settling; it depends on three principles for settling; it is included in three principles for settling; it is grouped with three principles for settling; it is settled through three principles for settling: Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ tayo samathe bhajati, tayo samathe upanissitaṁ, tayo samathe pariyāpannaṁ, tīhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati—through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

A legal issue arising from business belongs to one principle for settling; it depends on one principle for settling; it is included in one principle for settling; it is grouped with one principle for settling; it is settled through one principle for settling: Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ ekaṁ samathaṁ bhajati, ekaṁ samathaṁ upanissitaṁ, ekaṁ samathaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, ekena samathena saṅgahitaṁ, ekena samathena sammati—through resolution face-to-face.” sammukhāvinayenāti.

The twenty-first section on “belonging to” is finished. Bhajativāro niṭṭhito ekavīsatimo.

The legal issues and their settling are finished. Samathabhedo niṭṭhito.